You loot, We shoot. We’ve all seen the signs

I read some articles on how to protect your business from looters after a disaster. They said you should: cover your windows with plywood, purchase surveillance cameras, get an alarm system, back up your electronic data, and buy insurance. None of the them advised protecting your property with a gun. Why?

Let’s face it, looters are just as devasting to businesses as a disaster, and no one should have to stand by while their business is destroyed by thieves.

Now I know the argument will be “looters are just trying to get survival items,” but we all know this is bullshit. Watch any looter video, and you will see people running down the street with TVs, arms full of clothes, computers, etc. But for the sake of argument, let’s say they were getting food and water. Does that make it right for them to steal? No, especially if the owner is present and does not want to give it away as charity.

The truth is, looters are not weak, helpless, victims of a disaster. They are not black, white, or brown; male or female. They are just thieves, plain and simple.

I don’t believe looting after a disaster is a big problem overall, but that does not mean it should be overlooked or tolerated.

One world government, conspiracy or slow-moving social disaster

Is the push toward a one-world government, a conspiracy or slow-moving social disaster?

The truth is there has always been a push toward a one-world government. And it all started with the first group of people who worked to consolidate lands under their control. Many ancient civilizations like Rome expanded and failed as they ran out of money and blood, trying to accomplish this.

Today, the idea of a one-world government refers to a central government whose authority extends across the entirety of this planet. The idea is generally that the many countries of the world would join together in a federation under one central government.

And oh, how convenient that would be for the corrupt of our day? Under a one-world government, the number of politicians they would have to pay off and thus control would shrink, fortifying their power.

The only thing standing in their way is the will of free people who refuse to let it happen.

But the tide does appear to be changing in their favor due to generations of kids being slowly transformed into obedient followers.

Follow that with the creation of a weak underclass, and the chips start to fall into place for wealthy elitists who promise to give them a socialist utopia in which they no longer need to work. In this one world utopia, they will be free to play video games, play music, paint and enjoy the arts.

What could go wrong, right?

The most common proponents of this idea adhere to “liberal internationalism.” Commonly, they believe in a strengthened United Nations evolving into a world government. It is frequently suggested that the UN be supplemented with a directly elected parliamentary assembly, to give the UN authority independent of member states. They support international law as paramount over national law and see it evolving into a single global legal system, with individual citizens having direct access to international courts with the power to overrule national legislation.

Another viewpoint believes that world government must be preceded by a continental or regional government. This viewpoint supports the strengthening of the European Union and the duplication of the EU model in other regions of the world. It looks to the EU as one of the most advanced states of supranational integration in the world today. Once the world has been organized into regional or continental governments, then a world government can be established as a federation of these regional governments.

I think we can clearly see both views being played out today in the United Nations and the European Union. Just this week, German Chancellor Angela Merkle, along with France, backed the emergence of a European army. It sounds like they want to turn the EU into a country they control to me. Hopefully, the United Kingdom will be able to escape the controlling grip of the EU through Brexit before it’s too late.

Not to be outdone, the UN is trying to take control of the world’s immigration laws. Dick Morris describes their attempt to do this in his video “UN Tries To Grab Control Of Immigration!”

So, is the one-world government theory a conspiracy? No, it is not. The corrupt, greedy men and women of the world would love to see this come true.

If it does, it will be a disaster for all but the view at the top. A tragedy that will only end when your grandkids rise up and fight for the freedom that was lost so that their weak, lazy grandparents could freeload on the backs of others.

Reference RationalWiki.org

On this day, January 13th, in 1943, Hitler declares “Total War.”

On this day in 1943, Hitler declares “Total War.”

Hitler was the leader of the National Socialist German Workers (Nazi) Party. As leader, he attacked the Treaty of Versailles, promoted Pan-Germanism, anti-Semitism, and anti-communism. His charismatic oratory backed by Nazi propaganda found a receptive audience in Germany during the Great Depression.

Appointed chancellor in 1933, Hitler quickly consolidated power. Appointing himself Führer. In 1934 he soon turned Germany into a totalitarian one-party dictatorship.

Hitler and the Nazi regime were responsible for the killing of an estimated 19.3 million civilians and prisoners of war. The number of civilians killed was unprecedented and constitutes the deadliest conflict in human history.

Socialism never turns out to be a utopia and quickly becomes an authoritarian form of government.

Authoritarianism is marked by “indefinite political tenure” of the ruler or ruling party (often in a one-party state) or other authority.

Don’t ever give up your individual rights for a false promise.

Be prepared to live without

Be prepared to live without if you want to survive a disaster, any disaster.

Be prepared to live without power, and you will not need gasoline, solar panels, or generators.

Be prepared to live without grocery stores, and you will not need to put yourself in danger while trying to find food.

Be prepared to live without transportation, and you will not need a vehicle.

Be prepared to live without a permanent structure, and you will not need a house to keep you warm.

Be prepared to live without police, and you will not need to call 911.

Be prepared to live without doctors, and you will not need a hospital.

Do I want to live without? No, but I’m prepared to if need be.

Are you?

Orwell’s 1984 or Brave New World, which will it be

In Orwell’s dystopian novel 1984, a controlling government uses brutal force, torture, and mind control to keep individuals in line. While rulers in the book Brave New World keep the citizens in line with addictive drugs and pleasurable distractions.

In looking at the world’s current situation, I believe China is implementing their version of a high tech 1984. And socialist in America are hoping to sneak into absolute power by using the Brave New World model.

I hope that young Americas will open their eyes to the dangers of socialism. As for China’s young, their conditioning has been in the works for a while, and new technologies coming online are going to make any rebellion against their government a dangerous one.

In the coming years, total control of China’s young will come with the help of facial recognition, iris scans, geo-fencing, AI, data collection, and more. In this new society, they will be rated by the government on their trustworthiness, their “citizen score” which will follow them wherever they go. Good scores will bring good things, and bad scores will bring bad. Everything they do from birth to death will be part of their score and used against them if they fail to obey the ruler.

The “citizen score” is not science fiction, it is happening today. It will continue to spread across the world if not challenged.

The argument for a Brave New World in America will be the tried and true doublespeak. The new democratic socialist will promise the young everything. They will guarantee them a world where they can pursue their creative dreams without the worries of daily survival. The government will take care of them. No one will be a loser in this new society.

However, it will all be a lie. The first generation under control will live the good life. But, the next generations will suffer the consequences of their parent’s misguided dreams of Utopia.

The truth is there can be no Utopia ruled by elitists because a real Utopia would need no government.

So which will it be, a Brave New World, 1984, or self-reliance and freedom?

Teach your kids well because they will decide.